The M&A Cognitive Dissonance

Nordic’s 5 market signals expose M&A’s cognitive dissonance that despite a reputation for rigour, studies show 70–90% of deals fail.

For decades, the M&A practice has held a reputation for rigor and precision. But is it deserved? Seminal and recent studies agree that roughly 70% to 90% of deals fail to meet their objectives [1]. Would any other industry survive at this rate? Are beliefs and facts aligned?

Nordic presents 5 Market Signals to rethink the narrative:

1- Most M&A assessments analyze what is concretely measurable and struggle with intangibles. The core issue is not arithmetic; it is a narrow perspective. Hyper specialization has reduced the number of generalists who connect dots across functions and contexts. [2]

2- There is a gap in social skills, with newer generations showing the sharpest decline; industry leaders state soft skills are as critical as technical skills, yet the field remains undertrained in these areas. [2][3]

3- The M&A industry is moving contrary to the evidence: More AI, fewer humans, “Meet your new investment banker: an AI chatbot” [4]. Agentic tools are joining deal execution, and the human side is neglected precisely where ambiguity demands a holistic judgment.

4- The nº1 issue when closing deals is agreeing on valuation [5]. Since traditional valuations do not guarantee accuracy, operational and cultural due diligence become compulsory and will decide the next decade’s M&A winners and losers.

5- At Nordic, we are receiving an increasing number of existing customers demanding support in their M&A activity, with an explicit request for an operational and human-oriented approach.

To this day, the leading driver of M&A activity is still enabling growth in the core business [5], and that growth ambition collides with the 3 main reasons for failing to capture revenue synergies:
(i) ineffective product-portfolio mix,
(ii) unsuccessful go-to-market implementation, and
(iii) inability to incentivize and mobilize the sales team [6].

The real-world implication is clear: go-to-market integrators, sales specialists, and distribution network experts are set to become the value-creation enablers that the M&A industry needs.

“M&A credibility is threatened by the blind spot around culture and operations.”


References:

[1] The Big Idea: The New M&A Playbook.
https://hbr.org/2011/03/the-big-idea-the-new-ma-playbook
[2] Investment Professional of the Future (2019).
https://futureprofessional.cfainstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Investment-Professional-of-the-Future-FoF_Rev.pdf
[3] Why the Social and Verbal Skills of Some Gen Z Workers Have Declined.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/edwardsegal/2024/06/16/why-the-social-and-verbal-skills-of-some-gen-z-workers-have-declined/
[4] Meet your new investment banker: an AI chatbot.
https://www.ft.com/content/045dac3f-eb78-469d-a3ef-3495aefa6e8f
[5] 2025 M&A Deal Market Study (drivers of activity and top closing obstacles).
https://kpmg.com/kpmg-us/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2025/2025-ma-deal-market-study.pdf
[6] Bringing Science to the Art of Revenue Synergies (top challenges to capturing revenue synergies).
https://www.bain.com/insights/revenue-synergies-m-and-a-report-2022/

Share this post:

Related Posts

Scroll to Top
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email and click the verification link to confirm your subscription.

Newsletter

Gather actionable insights from industrial front-lines and stay ahead. Subscribe to Market Signals, our monthly newsletter.

Ota yhteyttä

Contact Us